No you are not insane - ARC Forum Deleted

[nikhsub1]

Just a heads up... all the threads in the OR ARC forum have been MOVED to the forum... The OR ARC forum does not exist any longer. Have a nice day.

[heartbreak]

Ellimist, so much for avoiding the stickies... The MOD strikes again.

[Ellimist]

Haha. BLAST! (er... Booooooooomblastandruin)

Oh well. nikhsub1... can we please have fewer stickies? This is insane - choose some "Bests" or something.

[nikhsub1]

Haha. BLAST! (er... Booooooooomblastandruin)

Oh well. nikhsub1... can we please have fewer stickies? This is insane - choose some "Bests" or something.

I'm way ahead of you... just gimme a day or two.

*edit* Fuck it, all unstuck but 1. They were an annoy in me arse and now they are but a memory.

[Ellimist]

aaahhh... ::sigh of relief:: it is so much clearer now!

Beautiful.

The Chronology sticky is probably a really good one, lest new people enter... "wtf is this dates side thingy about?"

[heartbreak]

aaahhh... ::sigh of relief:: it is so much clearer now!

Beautiful.

The Chronology sticky is probably a really good one, lest new people enter... "wtf is this dates side thingy about?"

They wouldn't do that, would they?

[Ellimist]

Ha, I really don't know. I just like the thread.

[Ellimist]

They wouldn't do that, would they?

I don't want to say "I told you so..." but...

[poco locomotive]

Thank you Niksub, this is so much better. I am glad stickies are greatly reduced, I like seeing the current topics at the top.

[bigm141414]

So who is going to start the List of Useful Threads for this book?

[heartbreak]

I don't want to say "I told you so..." but...

*shifty eyes* Like we didn't see that coming...

[sutrix]

So who is going to start the List of Useful Threads for this book?

There's not a lot that is useful in this side of the forum yet.

And I predict that there never will be as much discussion about OR--good or bad--as there was about HOL.

OR is confined within its pages, unlike HOL.

[John B.]

. . . I predict that there never will be as much discussion about OR--good or bad--as there was about HOL.

OR is confined within its pages, unlike HOL.

I think this is true as well, for what that's worth.

Nicely put.

[CpVb006]

I agree there will be less discussion, definetly. Mainly because I think not as many people will end up reading , because they don't even want to give it a change, or did give it a chance, but couldn't make a thing of it. So, less people reading it means less people coming her, coupled with the books (aforementioned) independant nature, I don't think this forum will grow to of Leaves size.

That said, I think there is a termendous amount to discuss and figure out, some of the ' more blatent puzzles (the colored dots, for example) will probably be thought over for a while here. We may never get a complete list of defined vocabulary and historical significances (who knows, someone may feel extra ambitions, but it's asking a lot), but I think that kinds of adds to the books presense.

Or something.