Page 320...firts full paragraph, third sentance. Here it is from the beginning though... "Regrettably, Tom fails to stop at a sip. A few hours later he has finished off the whole fifth as well as half a bottle of wine. He might have spent all night drinking had extion not caught up with me." He might have spent all night drinking had extion not caught up with ME. Who is Me? Zampano? Johnny? MZD? The sentance makes no sence if it is Tom. Is this an insight that there may have been more detail added here as to what Tom did that night while drinking if (again, Z, JT, MZD) weren't too tired to write about it? Or is it a typo? I don't think Typo is the way to go. The rest of the book is so precise that it doesn't seem like this would have been passed over. Given the fact that so many other aspects of HoL shine with ambiguity, I think it is safe to presume that this has some indication that someone other than Tom is indeed speaking here, and because of it we are missing out on a bit of the story. Who is tired and out of it. Well, i suppose you could argueably state that every character is in some way exted...This sentance is killing me. Is the exted from all the shifting and manipulating? I just don't know. Thought I'd throw it out there for you all to chew on. Lemme know. Thanks.
No announcement yet.
Typo or significance?Page Title Module
Move Remove Collapse